Web - Windows - iPhone
1. A Brahmana may eat the food given by twice-born men, who are praised for (the faithful performance of their) duties,
2. And he may accept (other gifts from them).3. Fire-wood, water, grass, roots, fruits, honey, (a promise of) safety, food brought unsolicited, a couch, a seat, shelter, a carriage, milk, sour milk, (roasted) grain, small fish, millet, a garland, venison, and vegetables, (spontaneously offered by a man) of any (caste) must not be refused,
4. Nor anything else that may be required for providing for (the worship of the) Manes and gods, for Gurus and dependents.
5. If the means for sustaining life cannot (be procured) otherwise, (they may be accepted) from a Sudra.
6. A herdsman, a husbandman, an acquaintance3. Apastamba I, 6, 18, 1; I, 6, 19, 13; Manu IV, 247-250.
4. Manu IV, 251. Gurus, i.e. parents and other venerable persons.
5. Apastamba I, 6, 18, 14.of the family, a barber, and a servant are persons whose food may be eaten,
7. And a trader, who is not (at the same time) an artisan.
8. (A householder) shall not eat every day (the food of strangers).
9. Food into which a hair or an insect has fallen (must not be eaten),
10. (Nor) what has been touched by a woman during her courses, by a black bird, or with the foot,
11. (Nor) what has been looked at by the murderer of a learned Brahmana,
12. (Nor) what has been smelt at by a cow,14. Nor (food) that (has turned) sour by itself, excepting sour milk,
15. (Nor) what has been cooked twice,[7. E.g. a man who sells pots, but does not make them.
8. Manu III, 104; Yagnvalkya I, 112.10. Apastamba I, 5, 16, 27, 30. Haradatta explains 'a black bird' by 'a crow,' and no doubt the crow, as the Kandala among birds, is intended in the first instance.
11. Manu IV, 208; Yagnavalkya I, 167.13. 'What has been given in a contemptuous manner by the host, or what is not pleasing to the eater, that is called bhavadushta, "naturally bad."'--Haradatta. The second seems to be the right explanatibn, as food falling under the first is mentioned below, Sutra 21.
14. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 18, 20.15. Haradatta states that this rule does not refer to dishes the preparation of which requires a double cooking, but to those which ordinarily are cooked once only.
16. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 17. Haradatta says that food prepared for the morning meal and kept until supper is also called parvushita, 'stale.']
kept), except vegetables, food that requires mastication, fatty and oily suibstanccs, meat and honey.
17. (Food given) by a person who has been cast off (by his parents), by a woman of bad character, an Abhisasta, a hermaphrodite, a police-officer, a carpenter, a miser, a jailer, a surgeon, one who hunts without using the bow, a man who eats the leavings (of others), by a multitude (of men), and by an enemy (must not be eaten),
18. Nor what is given by such men who defile the company at a funeral dinner, as have been enumerated before bald men;
19. (A dinner) which is prepared for no (holy) purpose or where (the guests) sip water or rise against the rule,
20. Or where (one's) equals are honoured in a different manner, and persons who are not (one's)
[17. For this and the following Sutras, see Apastamba I, 6, 18, 16-1, 6, 19, 1; Manu IV, 205-217; Yagnavalkya I, 161-165. An Abhisasta is a person who is wrongly or falsely accused of a heinous crime, see Apastamba I, 91 24, 6-9. Haradatta adduces the explanation 'hermaphrodite' for anapadesya as the opinion of others. He himself thinks that it means 'a person not worthy to be described or named.' 'One who hunts without using the bow' is a poacher who snares animals. Snaring animals is a favourite occupation of the non-Aryan tribes, such as Vaghris, Bhils, and Kolis.
18. See above, XV, 15-18, where 'bald men' occupy the fourteenth place in Sutra 18.
19. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 3; Manu IV, 212. That is called 'food (prepared) for no (sacred) purpose which a man cooks only for himself, not for guests and the rest, see Apastamba II, 4, 8, 4; Manu V, 7.
20. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 2.]equals are honoured in the same manner (as oneself, must not be eaten),
21. Nor (food that is given) in a disrespectful manner.
22. And the milk which a cow gives during the first ten days after calving (must not be drunk),
23. Nor (that) of goats and buffalo-cows (under the same conditions).
24. (The milk) of sheep, camels, and of one-hoofed animals must not be drunk under any circumstances,
25. Nor (that) of animals from whose udders the milk flows spontaneously, of those that bring forth twins, and of those giving milk while big with young,
26. Nor the milk of a cow whose calf is dead or separated from her.
27. And five-toed animals (must) not (be eaten) excepting the hedgehog, the hare, the porcupine, the iguana, the rhinoceros, and the tortoise,
28. Nor animals which have a double row of teeth, those which are covered with an excessive quantity of hair, those which have no hair, one-hoofed animals, sparrows, the (heron called) Plava, Brahmani ducks, and swans,
[21. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 4.24. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 23. 25. Apastamba, I, 5, 17, 23
26. Manu V, 8; Yagnvalkya I, 170.28. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 29, 33, 35. Haradatta gives as an example of 'animals covered with an excessive quantity of hair' the Yak or Bos grunniens, and of 'those that have no hair' snakes and the like.]
29. (Nor) crows, herons, vultures, and falcons, (birds) born in the water, (birds) with red feet and beaks, tame cocks and pigs,
30. (Nor) milch-cows and draught-oxen,31. Nor the flesh of animals whose milk-teeth have not fallen out, which are diseased, nor the meat of those (which have been killed) for no (sacred) purpose,
32. Nor young sprouts, mushrooms, garlic, and substances exuding (from trees),
33. Nor red (juices) which issue from incisions.34. Woodpeckers, egrets, ibis, parrots, cormorants, peewits, and flying foxes, (as well as birds) flying at night, (ought not to be eaten).
35. Birds that feed striking with their beaks, or scratching with their feet, and are not web-footed may be eaten,
36. And fishes that are not misshapen,[29. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 29, 32, 34, 35; Yagnvalkya I, 173.
30. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 29-30.31. Aitareya-brahmana VII, 14. For the explanation of vritha-mamsa, 'the flesh (of animals killed) for no (sacred) purpose,' Haradatta refers back to Sutra 19, but see also the Petersburg Dict. s. v. vritha.
32. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 26, 29; Manu V, 5, 6, 19.34. Manu V, 12; Yagnvalkya I, 173, Haradatta explains mandhala by vagvada, which seems to be the same as the bird vagguda, (Manu XII, 64). Mandhala is not found in our dictionaries, but it apparently is a vicarious form for manthala, which occurs in the Vagasaneyi-samhita and is said to be the name of a kind of mouse or rat, It seems to me that the large herbivorous bat, usually called the flying fox (in Gugarati vagud or vagul) is really meant, which, by an inaccurate observer, might be described both as a bird and as a kind of rat. See also Vasishtha XIV, 48.
35. Apastamba I, 5, 17, 32-33.37. And (animals) that must be slain for (the fulfilment of) the sacred law.
38. Let him eat (the flesh of animals) killed by beasts of prey, after having washed it, if no blemish is visible, and if it is declared to be fit for use by the word (of a Brahmana).
[37. I.e. animals offered at Sraddhas and Srauta-sacrifices, though under other circumstances forbidden, may be eaten both by the priests and other Brahmanas.
38. Haradatta takes vyala, 'beasts of prey,' to mean sporting dogs, which no doubt are also intended.]